JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 Score: 40,800 http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/sec.asp?conid=25965705 i9-7900x asus prime x299-A g-skill 4x4 3200MHz titan-x pascal Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 8, 2017 http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/sec.asp?conid=25965038&report=Summary i7 6950X X99 64g of Ram GTX 1080 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 Weird, the only category you are higher is the video, which is strange. I even have a higher weighted score, but yet you are in the top 2%. Shouldn't even be close????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) No, look under rankings.. its your internet that is bringing you waaay down! My video card is seriously OC as well My internet speed is 120 up and 10 down Edited August 8, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) Internet we both have the same weighted score 200. Big difference is video, I have 2783 to your 5355. Do not know why the big difference there. Also the last stat on the page: My video: 696 Yours: 1339 Yet 3d: My 3D: 44153 Yours: 32525 Edited August 8, 2017 by JaxMacFL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) Do a Unigen benchmark.. try that Also, Ive heard nothing but bad things with the 299 platform.. something is holding your back Edited August 8, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 Ok, will give it a go. My personal experience with the X299 platform is nothing but positive so far. Got a Time Spy score of 10,327 : http://www.3dmark.com/spy/2185854hitting 4.5GHz on all 10 cores. I believe where there are problems lie with the others needing to catch up to the X299 platform. Of course could be totally wrong there. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) Im sure it is good.. just the reviews, etc. Knowing myself, I may upgrade soon, just because lol Edited August 8, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
terry1966 Posted August 8, 2017 the 2d score difference is down to screen resolution difference. Rmegi7 is running a lower screen resolution at 1920x1080 so will score higher in the pit test video score and that's why the pit test is not really a reliable test for comparing a systems performance. you can score a lot more video points just by running low resolution and low bit colour. they are both very very nice systems and i'm totally envious of you both. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 TY terry!! Rme, here is my heaven stats @ 3440x1440 Default: http://imgur.com/CsDArmN Extteme: http://imgur.com/7mlhpWv Extreme temps: http://imgur.com/MP5WBDD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
caintry_boy Posted August 8, 2017 Why don't you boys try Cinebench > http://http.maxon.net/pub/benchmarks/CINEBENCHR15.038.zip Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 I will give it a try sonny. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 8, 2017 (edited) Here's my results from Cinebench, ran cpu and gpu twice for good measure: CPU: <a href='http://i.imgur.com/die22n8' title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/die22n8.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a> GPU: <a <a href='http://i.imgur.com/lz1zWJH' title=''><img src='http://i.imgur.com/lz1zWJH.jpg' alt='' title='Hosted by imgur.com' /></a> Actually running Win 10 Home 64bit, dont know why test results say Win 8. P.S. Got rid of other links and got the right ones in. Got rid of photobucket and figuring out new one. Edited August 8, 2017 by JaxMacFL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 9, 2017 (edited) Oh man.. I dont need to run it.. we know his system out shines mine by miles lol - What monitor do you use? I have the ASUS 27" 144hz / 1080p 1ms Did some BF4 gameplay a while back.. Edited August 9, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 9, 2017 Acer 34" Predator gsync 100Hz refresh. 3440x1440 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 9, 2017 (edited) Are you on Steam or Origin? My steam acct is LONERANGER® Origin is LONERANGERTX Edited August 9, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 9, 2017 (edited) Same user name on steam also. Not on origin P.S. Nice BF4 video mate. Edited August 9, 2017 by JaxMacFL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 9, 2017 Sweet! I sent you a friend request.. you play COD at all? I'm doing BF4/1 mostly nowadays Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 9, 2017 No, not into mp war games at all. Young mans game. I am old man, lol, 66 years old, or as I like to say 46 and 240 months. Big fan of TDU2 and the Fallout series though. Accepted your friend request, kool. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rmegi7 Posted August 9, 2017 (edited) NO NO NO!! Never to old! I just turned 56 myself! TDU and Fallout? Hmm, may have to look into it! Oh, I just looked lol, that's way to slow for me Edited August 9, 2017 by Rmegi7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JaxMacFL Posted August 10, 2017 (edited) TDU2 is not slow when cruising down the road at 180 plus through traffic and fallout 4 keeps you on your toes too. Granted neither one is run and gun, (maybe fo4 at times). Older games but good games, like fo3 and gta:sa. Heck, my first tv computer game was pong, then upgraded to intellivision. First computer games were Ripper (cool Blue Oyster Cult song Reaper), Zork Nemisis and Inquisitor and 11th Hour. Like over 20 years ago. Edited August 10, 2017 by JaxMacFL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.png.9d4b89b15b2cd5e65edd93a0e6823dce.png)
