2D Video Benchmark

[alberto]

Should i send it back cause my on board did way better on the 2d part. I thinking it's damage but can still play games only reason i got it.

I know pci is a bottleneck.

http://www.pcpitstop.com/betapit/sec.asp?c...;report=Summary

 

http://www.sparkle.com.tw/product_detail.a...&sub_id=278 this is the 3dcard i just install

 

this is my rig spec

 

OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Build 2600

OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation

System Name THEKING10

System Manufacturer HP Pavilion 061

System Model PW710AA-ABA A1023C

System Type X86-based PC

Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~3000 Mhz

BIOS Version/Date American Megatrends Inc. 3.28, 1/23/2006

SMBIOS Version 2.4

Windows Directory C:\WINDOWS

System Directory C:\WINDOWS\system32

Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1 <--232 GB

Locale United States

Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2111)"

User Name THEKING10\Albert

Time Zone Pacific Daylight Time

Total Physical Memory 1,024.00 MB

Available Physical Memory 379.88 MB

Total Virtual Memory 2.00 GB

Available Virtual Memory 1.96 GB

Page File Space 4.88 GB

Page File C:\pagefile.sys

Edited October 27, 2009 by alberto

[IntelGuy]

 

I would not return the card becasue of the 2D test score. That is mainly desktop and line-drawing functions. If you want a higher 2D score you can turn off some eye candy and change the color depth to 16 bit, or maybe try an older driver.

 

More important is that the card is getting a decent 3D score, which is the expectation for an add-in display adapter.

[alberto]

Thanks for the help sir surprised the pci 9400 gt even play these games i have installed and i agree the 3d did ok even for a pci.

 

Hope to get a new computer for next year with all the goodies. I seen the 2009 computers and i am drooling really want one but money is tight this year.

[IntelGuy]

There should be some good deals around Christmas time.