LuisP24 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Just curious on this.. A friend of mine has an older desktop with onboard graphics. He tells me how slow everything runs, and I told him its most likely due to using onboard instead of separate graphics card. So he asks if I could get one and put it in for him (he's paying for the card and all). So I checked out the system and it is possible to do so. Maybe not worth it, IMO, but he's paying. His system is: Celeron 1.8GHz (socket 478) 1 GB (2x 512MB) SDRAM - PC133 (I think) 300 watt PSU 1 available PCI slot - NO AGP or PCI-E So I see there's actually quite a few GPUs in PCI interface available. (I thought this was old technology that was replaced with AGP, and now PCI-E) But what I'm wondering about is, how come PCI ones cost a bit more than AGP (and even some PCI-E)? Example: I just got an EVGA e-GeForce 6200 AGP for my old system.. under $40 The same card in PCI format is $45 How come? Wouldn't the AGP one perform better and be worth more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el kido Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 PCI would be better, but not really much. for a low budget like that, your best bet is this card. LINK It will play games like WOW and all 2D games even sims. But after that, your pushin it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 If you build it, they will come. There's a premium because AGP & PCIe dominate in terms of interfaces for GPUs. Just like DDR is more expensive than DDR2 now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuisP24 Posted October 5, 2009 Author Share Posted October 5, 2009 el kido - Thanks, looks like a good deal to me. I'll show my friend and see what he thinks, maybe be ordering in the next few days for sure. Would there be any problems using a DirectX10 card? System is running WinXP Pro SP3 which includes DirectX9.0c brandon - That makes sense, I hadn't thought about it like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
el kido Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 There will be no issues at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porksandwich9113 Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 PCI is a load better than onboard trust me there. My old system was an emachines T2042. 2.0Celeron 256MB Ram 40GB HD Onboard Intel Graphics. I upgraded, unlocked the motherboard, and OC'ed this thing to 2.7Ghz Celeron 1.25GB Ram 250GB HD Radeon 9250 PCI 256MB card. Obviously I couldn't play the best games in the world, but I could actually run things like World of Warcraft, Halo 1, Warcraft III, and Sims 2 at about 25-30 FPS. That was at a 1280X1024 resolution, and mid-high graphics settings. If you ask me, a cheap route would be: Drop a new processor in. P4 in the 2.6-2.8Ghz range. You could find them on ebay for a steal these days. 20$ tops.. http://cgi.ebay.com/Intel-P4-2-8Ghz-1M-533...id=p3286.c0.m14 Grab a decent PCI card.. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814133245 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wigan Posted October 11, 2009 Share Posted October 11, 2009 If you dropped a new processor in you would have to check the FSB of the motherboard. This PC I'm on now is pretty old and only supports 400mhz FSB processors. I think the limit on these is 2.6ghz P4's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now