ineedhelpregularly21 Posted December 23, 2006 Running Windows XP Pro x86 (x64 produces dubious results for my QX6700 at speeds over 3.3 GHz): http://www.pcpitstop.com/techexpress.asp?id=CBGXFWY7TNJS9A4J Mike you can post that to the 7000 club Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flewpastu Posted December 23, 2006 you can post that to the 7000 club he did that 1st :beer: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aaronlewis89 Posted December 23, 2006 surely mike you have more 2D video Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsurf48 Posted December 23, 2006 (edited) surely mike you have more 2D video I get 2D video scores in the mid 500s under Windows XP Pro x64 Edition, but unfortunately the CPU test has some kind of problem with a QX677 at 3.3 GHz and above. The raw score is 56 trillion, which is adjusted to 10 thousand giving an overall total over 12 thousand, but it seemed more appropriate to post it to the problems section than here. I'm not sure why the x86 video drivers are producing scores several hundred points below the x64 drivers; both are nVidia 93.71. I'll try a couple of different drivers I've found on the web today and see what happens. I'm even more curious to find out why a Geforce 8800 GTX gets 2D scores barely over 100. So far, I haven't been able to locate a discussion about this, probably because people are too busy messing around with the 3D performance the 8800s do well. It's also interesting that running the memory with 1:1 ratio to the FSB and 3-3-3-8-5T timings, even though the DDR clock is only a bit over 600, produces almost identical results to running it at around 1000 with 4-4-4-12-6T timings. This is consistent with results I've seen from people who did a lot of testing with different memory settings, especially with the 975x chipset. Mike Edited December 23, 2006 by Windsurf48 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shogan191 Posted December 23, 2006 I get 2D video scores in the mid 500s under Windows XP Pro x64 Edition, but unfortunately the CPU test has some kind of problem with a QX677 at 3.3 GHz and above. The raw score is 56 trillion, which is adjusted to 10 thousand giving an overall total over 12 thousand, but it seemed more appropriate to post it to the problems section than here. I'm not sure why the x86 video drivers are producing scores several hundred points below the x64 drivers; both are nVidia 93.71. I'll try a couple of different drivers I've found on the web today and see what happens. I'm even more curious to find out why a Geforce 8800 GTX gets 2D scores barely over 100. So far, I haven't been able to locate a discussion about this, probably because people are too busy messing around with the 3D performance the 8800s do well. It's also interesting that running the memory with 1:1 ratio to the FSB and 3-3-3-8-5T timings, even though the DDR clock is only a bit over 600, produces almost identical results to running it at around 1000 with 4-4-4-12-6T timings. This is consistent with results I've seen from people who did a lot of testing with different memory settings, especially with the 975x chipset. Mike I think you over wrote your test at 3.3. Could you post another at that speed? I'd like to take a look at it. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsurf48 Posted December 23, 2006 I think you over wrote your test at 3.3. Could you post another at that speed? I'd like to take a look at it. Thanks. I reran at 3.4, which gets the same results. Here's the link: http://www.pcpitstop.com/techexpress.asp?id=E8VXFWJV8JJSGK4J Also, this is the link to CPU-Z validation run just before the test: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=149443 Here's a text copy of the results: Processor (CPU) Millions of instructions per second (MIPS) 56000000000 0.100 10000 Memory (RAM) Megabytes per second (MB/sec) 15184 0.100 1518 Video 2D Megapixels per second (MP/sec) 559 1.000 559 Uncached Disk I/O Megabytes per second (MB/sec) 172 2.000 344 Internet Download Kilobits per second (Kb/sec) 285 4961 0.100 100 Tips Deduction for red/yellow flags 1 -10 -10 Total Weighted Score 12511 From the details page: Brand/Model Intel #6f7 (4 CPUs) Nominal Clock Speed 2660 MHz Measured Clock Speed 3400 MHz CPU Load 0% Speed Rating 56000000000 (No similar CPU/MHz) "No similar CPU" seems like an understatement, or would if the result were accurate. Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tarawa Posted December 24, 2006 We have a winner, folks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Windsurf48 Posted December 24, 2006 We have a winner, folks! I have a question about your video card. Which nVidia drivers are you using? Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shogan191 Posted December 24, 2006 Untill the 8800 cards came out the Nvidia cards scored extremely well on the PitStop 2D Video test as long as they were not in SLI. Now the 8800s are scoring lower than even the ATI cards did. Thanks for posting that up again Mike. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tarawa Posted December 24, 2006 I have a question about your video card. Which nVidia drivers are you using? Mike 91.47 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superdude688 Posted December 24, 2006 (edited) From the details page: Brand/Model Intel #6f7 (4 CPUs) Nominal Clock Speed 2660 MHz Measured Clock Speed 3400 MHz CPU Load 0% Speed Rating 56000000000 (No similar CPU/MHz) no way in bloody hell. that cant be right. i mean come on, 3.2 Ghz = 48790 mips and 3.4Ghz = 56000000000 mips??? just no. something went wrong here. Edited December 24, 2006 by Superdude688 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raptor Posted December 24, 2006 Yep... he's been very busy lately. I'm not sure if he'll get a score in Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flewpastu Posted December 24, 2006 we're hoping to see a few more quads to post @ or above 3.3 - 3.4 to see whats up not sure yet what the issue is ........... may be a Pit glitch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prof. Dr. Silver Posted December 24, 2006 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Amazing Score man!!!! "Overall score for system "ACACIA": 12511 " What do you mean '8000' club???? Let go to the '12000' right away....!!!! LOL Prof. Dr. Silver :beer: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prof. Dr. Silver Posted December 24, 2006 (edited) Okay guys Now seriously, I think I have an issue and no solution for it..... Here is the latest test : 3336 First of all: I made a little improvement with Ati Tool and got my card up to 516 MP or something....which is great! However... I was really hoping for a 3450 score....but I noticed that my HD score is only 68??? I have a RAID 0 setup and yesterday i still scored 120+.... Anybody knows what went wrong? According to the Bios everything is still the same..... Also the PC Pitstop test show 299Mhz FSB eventhough all others say 300Mhz(Like CPU-Z).... And for the last thing....I can't seem to go higher than 300Mhz....no matter what I try! Could I be maxed out? Is there anything else I can do to up my score? This way I'll never beat Gryph or let alone Windsurf48. LOL Thx, Prof. Dr. Silver :beer: Ps. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!!! Edited December 24, 2006 by Prof. Dr. Silver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superdude688 Posted December 24, 2006 we're hoping to see a few more quads to post @ or above 3.3 - 3.4 to see whats up not sure yet what the issue is ........... may be a Pit glitch its gotta be a glitch dude.....no way a 200mhz gain would account for a 55999951210 mips gain. unless it is made of magic that only gets unleashed when it gets to 3.4ghz o.O;; Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntelGuy Posted December 24, 2006 Okay guys Now seriously, I think I have an issue and no solution for it..... Here is the latest test : 3336 First of all: I made a little improvement with Ati Tool and got my card up to 516 MP or something....which is great! However... I was really hoping for a 3450 score....but I noticed that my HD score is only 68??? I have a RAID 0 setup and yesterday i still scored 120+.... Anybody knows what went wrong? According to the Bios everything is still the same..... Also the PC Pitstop test show 299Mhz FSB eventhough all others say 300Mhz(Like CPU-Z).... And for the last thing....I can't seem to go higher than 300Mhz....no matter what I try! Could I be maxed out? Is there anything else I can do to up my score? This way I'll never beat Gryph or let alone Windsurf48. LOL Thx, Prof. Dr. Silver :beer: Ps. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!!! Merry Christmas Prof! That's actually a good overclock for that board You're already sitting at 3424, so...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aaronlewis89 Posted December 24, 2006 theres a cap on vid scores? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shogan191 Posted December 24, 2006 Okay guys Now seriously, I think I have an issue and no solution for it..... Here is the latest test : 3336 First of all: I made a little improvement with Ati Tool and got my card up to 516 MP or something....which is great! However... I was really hoping for a 3450 score....but I noticed that my HD score is only 68??? I have a RAID 0 setup and yesterday i still scored 120+.... Anybody knows what went wrong? According to the Bios everything is still the same..... Also the PC Pitstop test show 299Mhz FSB eventhough all others say 300Mhz(Like CPU-Z).... And for the last thing....I can't seem to go higher than 300Mhz....no matter what I try! Could I be maxed out? Is there anything else I can do to up my score? This way I'll never beat Gryph or let alone Windsurf48. LOL Thx, Prof. Dr. Silver :beer: Ps. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!!! There are always some differences between tests but you could try defraging a couple of times and closing all background programs to get the few points on disk score back. You have a great overclock. Video is where you have the most available points and I know it's hard to get with an ATI card. You need to come across a nVidia card. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miggs78 Posted December 24, 2006 So we have somebody who beats Gryph, damn thats a preety good score by Windsurf48, good work bro, beating Gryph's score is definitely not easy, he is like OC GOD or something ... Merry Christmas Fellas !!, God bless ya'll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shogan191 Posted December 24, 2006 Merry Christmas TinyTim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lou Posted December 24, 2006 So we have somebody who beats Gryph, damn thats a preety good score by Windsurf48, good work bro, beating Gryph's score is definitely not easy, he is like OC GOD or something ... Gryph may be down, but not out. Look for something from his bag of tricks yet. In the midnight hour ..screamed more, more, more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
X_C Posted December 24, 2006 The fat lady isn't even warming up to sing...stay tuned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.png.9d4b89b15b2cd5e65edd93a0e6823dce.png)
