Jump to content

Change Mode

ewitte

Members
  • Posts

    204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ewitte

  1. Hmm. Somebody had some Conroe Cinebench results that went down with the 64 bit version.
  2. At this point Intels 64bit really is not supported all that much. Benchmarks tend to show it getting LOWER scores than it does in 32-bit mode. With AMD its usually higher. I think its just bad coding because everything has been optimized for AMD.
  3. What were you getting on the standard single core test? The reason I ask is I don't think they made any other changes other than making it multithreaded. I get about 9150 on the standard test. Dual core will never get more than 200% in any test using the same proceedure. Given that my max would be 18300 which is less than your 2.9 (says 2.75?) test. The thing is efficiency will never be 100% so the score has to be lower. Honestly unless they made other changes I think the earlier betas might have had some flaw that raise the score slightly. Thats really not a bad OC there. I generally run 2.72Ghz at 1.48 or 1.5v. My tests at 2.93Ghz require over 1.7 volts and I'd never run that everyday. Probably more the BIOS setting is 113% of 1.55v. To get even 2.8Ghz will probably still require 1.6v.
  4. What were you getting before? I'm about 1000 over yours... http://www.pcpitstop.com/techexpress.asp?id=DAPG0WUTYXQSN4JR
×
×
  • Create New...